作为一种特殊的立法行为，授权立法的实施理应限定在特定的范围内。在传统观点中，授权立法范围一般仅指授权立法的权限范围。但从授权立法的理论和实践分析，授权立法范围除授权立法权限范围之外，还应当包括授权立法主体范围和授权立法期限范围。国内外授权立法范围均经历了从宽泛到明确的演变历程。

授权立法主体包括授权主体和受权主体。从各国授权立法实践观察，授权立法主体的范围尚无明确规范的要求。应当为授权立法主体设定范围，按照一定的原则以实际需要和工作职能为依据设定授权立法主体的资格条件。授权立法权限范围也是实施授权立法的权限边界，是立法事项中可授权和不可授权的界限。法律保留理论，特别是重要性理论，为授权立法权限范围提供了理论支撑。我国授权立法权限范围的确定在一定程度上也遵循了法律保留理论，但还存在规定笼统、缺乏逻辑自洽等问题。授权立法期限范围规定了立法授权书的时间范围，对授权立法具有重要意义。实践中，部分国家规定授权必须要明确授权期限，部分国家对此并无明确要求。早前，在我国的授权立法中，无论是专门性授权立法还是一般性授权立法，均无明确的授权期限要求，这造成了实践中的诸多困扰。2015年修正的《立法法》增加了对授权立法期限的明确要求，完善了我国授权立法期限范围制度。

为防止授权立法超越范围，建立有效的监督机制十分必要。西方国家对授权立法的监督主要有立法监督和司法监督。在立法监督中，立法机关以程序原则和越权原则为依据，监督授权立法在范围内规范运行；在司法监督中，司法机关按照相应的标准实施司法审查监督，以监督授权立法行为不得超越范围。我国主要通过批准、备案和审查等立法监督机制监督超越授权立法范围的行为。在监督效果上，我国的监督机制还有进一步完善的空间。

为进一步明确授权立法范围，规范授权立法的实施，建议从统一授权立法的概念范畴、限定授权立法的主体范围、厘定授权立法的权限范围、规范授权立法的期限范围、健全授权立法的监督机制五个方面完善相关制度。

在内容构成上，本书共分导论、本论和结语三部分。本论是本书的主体部分，共由六章组成。

第一章阐述授权立法范围的一般理论。以授权立法范围的界定为切入点，对授权立法范围的理论依据和法律依据进行探讨，从横向和纵向两个角度分析授权立法范围的作用，对授权立法范围的发展演变进行回顾。

第二章研究授权立法主体范围。本章对授权立法主体的种类和特征进行归纳，并通过考察中西方国家授权立法的实践，对确定授权立法主体范围的原则和依据以及授权立法主体的资格条件进行思考，指出我国授权立法主体范围存在的问题。

第三章研究授权立法权限范围。授权立法权限范围是授权立法范围的核心。通过对立法权限划分的回顾，考察中西方国家授权立法权限的实践，对授权立法权限范围中的有关理论和实践问题进行讨论，并以《立法法》第8条、第9条为分析对象，对我国授权立法权限范围进行反思。

第四章研究授权立法期限范围。授权立法期限范围对授权立法具有重要的意义。本章对中西方国家授权立法期限范围的具体做法进行考察，并就授权期限届满后的处理方式进行讨论。

第五章研究控制超越授权立法范围的有关问题。有效的监督机制是防控超越授权立法范围的重要途径。本章从超越授权立法范围行为的类型和控制理据入手，对西方国家的立法和司法监督机制进行考察，分析我国的立法监督方式及具体标准，指出我国在授权立法监督方面存在的问题和不足。

第六章提出完善我国授权立法范围的建议。针对我国在授权立法范围方面存在的问题，建议从五个方面完善我国授权立法范围的相关规定。

关键词：授权立法；授权立法范围；授权立法主体范围；授权立法权限范围；授权立法期限范围；法律监督

Abstract

As a special legislative action,it should be restricted in specific scope for the implementation of delegated legislation.In traditional view,the scope of delegated legislation only generally refers to the scope of delegated legislative power.Analyzed on the theory and practice of delegated legislation,besides the scope of delegated legislative power,the scope of delegated legislation should include the scope of authority and the term of delegated legislation.The scope of delegated legislation has went through the evolution from broad to explicit at home and abroad.

Theauthority of delegated legislation include the delegating authority and delegated authority.Based on the observation of the practice of delegated legislation of countries,it has not been asked for explicit normative requirements for the authority of delegated legislation.The authority of delegated legislation should be set scope and the qualification of authority of delegated legislation by a certain principles and the actual demand and responsibility.The scope of delegated legislative power also is the confine of competence of delegated legislation and the authorized and unauthorized matters in legislation.The theory of law reservation,especial the materiality theory,is the theoretical support for the scope of delegated legislative power.In China,the determination of the scope of delegated legislative power has obeyed the law reservation in a certain extent,but it still had flaws such as regulation ambiguity and without Logic self-consistent.The scope of term of delegated legislation stimulate the extent of empowered term,which is very important for delegated legislation.In practice,some countries claimed that delegated legislation must be specified the term of ment explicitly.But another countries who had not specified the term of empowerment explicitly.In earlier time,in our delegated legislation,not only specialized delegated legislation but also generalized delegated legislation had not regulated the demand of delegated term which made numerous puzzles in practice.In 2015,When the Legislation Law of P.R.C.was amended,it was added to the provision of term which improved the rule of scope of term of delegated legislation in China.

In order to control the legislative activitieswhich transcend the scope of delegated legislation,it is necessary for delegated legislation to be established effective supervisory mechanism.There are mainly legislative supervision and judicial supervision in The Western.In legislative supervision,based on legislative process and principle of ultra vires,the legislative authority supervised the implementation of empowered legislation in the scope of empowerment.In judicial supervision,for supervising the delegated legislation without transcending the scope of empowerment,the judicial authority carried out judicial examination and supervision by a certain standards.In China,it mainly includes approval,recordation and examination to control the behavior which would transcend the scope of delegated legislation.In the effect of supervision,the supervisory mechanism still has roomage to improve in China.

For specifying the scope of delegated legislation further and normalizing the implementation of authorized legislation,the paper suggested that we should unify the scope of conception of delegated legislation,prescribe a limit to the scope of theauthority of delegated legislation,determine the scope of delegated legislative power,normalize the scope of the term of delegated legislation,complete the scope of the supervisory mechanism of delegated legislation to improve the interrelated institution.

In the composition of contents,the paper includes three parts which are introduction,principal argument and conclusion.Principal argument is the body of the paper which includes six chapters：

ChapterⅠstated a general theory of delegated legislation.It was started from the definition of delegated legislation,discussed the scope of theoretical and legal ground of delegated legislation,analyzed the function of scope of delegated legislation from longitudinal and lateral angle and retrospect the evolution of the scope of delegated legislation.

ChapterⅡ studied the scope of the authority of delegated legislation.In the chapter,the paper concluded the types and character of the authority of delegated legislation.By viewing the practice of delegated legislation in China and The Western,the thesis reflected the principle and gist which were used to ascertain the scope of authority of delegated legislation,and qualification of authority of delegated legislation.Then,the paper pointed out the deficiency of the authority of delegated legislation in our country.

ChapterⅢ researched the scope of delegated legislative power.The scope of the delegated legislative power is the core of the scope of empowered legislation.Through reviewing the division of the delegated legislative power,the paper viewed the practice of delegated legislation in China and The Western,discussed the theoretical and practical issues,and reflected the scope of Chinese delegated legislative power based on the Legislation Law of P.R.C.article 8 and 9.

ChapterⅣ studied the scope of term of delegated legislation.The scope of term of delegated legislation is very important for empowered legislation.In this chapter,the paper researched the concrete action for the scope of term of delegated legislation in China and The Western and discussed the processing mode after the expiration of the scope of term of delegated legislation.

ChapterⅤ studied the issues of restrict to transcend the scope of delegated legislation.It was important approach for efficient supervisory mechanism to control to transcend the scope of delegated legislation.The chapter began from the classification of transcending the scope of delegated legislation,viewed legislative monitor mode and concrete standards in China and pointed out the issues and drawback of legislative supervision in China.

ChapterⅥ proposed some suggestions to improve our scope of delegated legislation.In this chapter,facing the questions in the scope of delegated legislation,it was suggested that our scope of delegated legislation should be improved from five aspects.

Key words: Delegated Legislation; Scope of Delegated Legislation;Scope of Authority of Delegated Legislation;Scope of Delegated Legislative Power;Scope of Term of Delegated Legislation;Legal Supervision