受2008年5·12汶川地震影响，四川章村93.2%的房屋倒塌，居住的连续性和稳定性被迫中断，农房重建成为震后恢复重建的重要内容之一。在灾害这一特殊社会情境下，村落边界开放，国家和社会组织等多主体介入章村农房重建，共同形塑了统规统建的村落空间格局。审视章村住房重建过程可以发现，章村住房重建明显区别于个体建造活动：建造行为由基金会等外部力量主导，建造目标极强调作为整体的村庄重建，农房重建所依据的是外部机构的制度性逻辑，而非本地村民的日常逻辑。

《筑与居：震后居住空间的建构/中国社会科学博士论文文库》认为，震后章村居住空间的生成不仅仅表现为物理空间的生成过程，是作为话语性实在被社会地建构的过程。震后居住空间作为话语性实在，是经由参与式话语、规划话语、技术话语、建筑话语、机构话语、政府官方话语、灾害话语等多重话语建构而成的。外部力量通过话语与权力的相互建构性，介入章村空间秩序的生产与干预，从而表明空间争夺成为章村震后居住空间生产的核心内容，即震后居住空间的生产表现为外部力量与社区争夺空间并实现意义表征的过程。这一空间争夺包括两方面含义，一是特定空间形式的生产，二是由此空间形式所实现的特定的意义表征。空间争夺同样能够用于理解新农村建设、城中村改造、城市更新等社会工程中空间实践的运作逻辑。

Zhang village，located in the disaster-affected area of “5·12” Wenchuan earthquake，was severely destroyed with 93.2% houses damaged.The continuity and stability of occupancy were interrupted and thus house rebuilding becomes the major agenda of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction.In the context of nationwide earthquake relief，governments at all levels and social organizations participate in the post-disaster reconstruction.Based on field research，this thesis looks into the process of house rebuilding and argues that post-disaster dwelling spaces are not only the generation of the physical space，but also the social construction of discourse reality.

The effect of reconstruction is the emerging of new physical space in Zhang village.Z Foundation signed a memorandum with municipality level to assist Zhang village as a key coordinator.Needs assessment group，design group and technical support group also participated in through the network of Z Foundation.Based on my fieldwork conducted in January 2009，February 2009，August 2010，and July 2012，I found that the newly built dwelling space represents to be co-existing of uniform space and differentiated space.Firstly，the spatial distribution of seven village groups becomes more concentrated and is arranged along the village road.Secondly，there are rarely no differences between the appearances of the building，all with same design and decorations.Differentiated space retreated to the interior and backyard.Most of the newly built houses are brick and concrete，with only two personal designed wooden houses.Thirdly，the resemblance eliminates household differences；the reconstructed village represents a new landscape with the co-existence of uniform space and differentiated space.

The process of house reconstruction implies a particular logic of space production.House construction，which consists of site selection，design and construction，is usually an individual activity，changed under the context of post-disaster reconstruction.Firstly，house construction is led by Z Foundation and other outside agencies，with coordinating role of construction shifted from the villagers to Z Foundation，designed by outside expert team，built by specialized team，and with most of the subsidies from government and Z Foundation.Secondly，the construction aims at achieving the reconstruction of the village as a whole instead of the individual dwelling space.The construction prioritized the overall planning and then individual arrangement.The application of participatory method，the concern of the progress of construction，and the management strategy of “what about the others” all imply a special concern for the whole.Thirdly，the reconstruction follows the hidden logic of outside institutions instead of local everyday logic，and the latter is subordinate to the former.

Further analysis revealed that dwelling space as discursive reality is constructed by multiple discourses.Dwelling space of Zhang village is not a pure physical space，but a kind of discursive reality which is constructed by multiple discourses of participatory discourse，planning discourse，technique discourse，architecture discourse，institutional discourse，official discourse and disaster discourse.Furthermore，the intervention of outside agencies into the production of space order derives from the mutual construction of discourse and power.The case of Zhang village illustrates that space grabbing lies at the center of post-disaster dwelling space construction，which focus on grabbing space and representing the meanings.This space grabbing implies not only the production of specific space but also the meaning which it represents.The logic of space grabbing also fits into the cases of new-countryside construction，city-villages rebuilt，and city renewal.

Chapter one illustrates research question and methods employed in the study.This chapter also introduces the approach of social constructionism，and focuses on the issue of construction of dwelling space.

Chapter two provides a review of the literature，including disaster research，space research，and discourse analysis.And then I propose an analysis framework which outlines the macro-background of the construction of dwelling space.

Chapter three points out that post-disaster intervention and the setting of the agenda of community reconstruction are all the results of problem-claiming，at both macro and micro level.

Chapter four describes the detailed process of the generation of uniform space which dominated by Z Foundation.

Chapter five describes the detailed process of differentiated individual space arrangements.

Chapter six analyses the phenomenon of co-existing of uniform space and differentiated space，and then analyses the social construction of this mixed reality.

Chapter seven draws out the conclusions from this research，and opens a discussion for future studies.

Key words： Disaster；Dwelling space；Social construction；Discourse；Space grabbing