十八大报告明确提出要“建设哲学社会科学创新体系”。哲学社会科学评价体系建设是“建设哲学社会科学创新体系”中的重要环节，人文社会科学期刊评价是哲学社会科学评价体系的重要组成部分。随着期刊数量的不断增长，以及电子期刊、开放获取期刊等新形式期刊的不断涌现，对人文社会科学期刊进行科学评价，对于匡正学术风气，提升研究水平，促进学术交流有着重要意义。本报告按照提出问题、分析问题、解决问题的思路展开，共分为四部分：第一部分：中国人文社会科学期刊评价：现状·问题·建议。在分析国内外主要期刊评价成果的基础上，指出现有人文社会科学期刊评价存在意识形态属性评价指标不突出、评价数据公开透明性待加强、定性评价方法待改进、评价理论基础待完善等问题，随后针对这些问题提出了改进的对策建议。第二部分：中国人文社会科学期刊综合评价指标体系。针对第一部分提出的问题，中国社会科学评价中心提出“中国人文社会科学期刊综合评价指标体系”。该指标体系契合期刊编辑出版流程，强调学术性评价，同时加入意识形态属性指标，评价打分引入扣分机制，不仅重视对期刊的评价，更注重对期刊的引导。第三部分：2014年中国人文社会科学期刊评价报告研制说明。该部分不仅介绍了本次评价活动中期刊的学科归类方法、评价数据的来源及采集时间等内容，还提出了本次评价活动中期刊的划分等级方式：顶级、权威、核心和扩展，并对每个等级的划分方法进行了阐述。第四部分：2014年中国人文社会科学期刊评价结果。该部分是采用中国人文社会科学期刊综合评价指标体系，对我国733种人文社会科学期刊进行了评价，共评出17种顶级期刊，40种权威期刊，430种核心期刊和246种扩展期刊。

The report of the 18th National Congress clearly proposed to "build an innovation system of philosophy and social sciences". The construction of the evaluation system of philosophy and social sciences is an important link in the "construction of philosophy and social science innovation system", and the evaluation of humanities and social science journals is an important part of the evaluation system of philosophy and social sciences. With the continuous growth of the number of journals and the emergence of new forms of journals such as electronic journals and open access journals, scientific evaluation of humanities and social science journals is of great significance to correct academic atmosphere, improve research level, and promote academic exchanges. This report is divided into four parts: Part I: Evaluation of Chinese Social Science Journals: Current Situation, Problems, and Recommendations. Based on the analysis of the evaluation results of major journals at home and abroad, it is pointed out that the evaluation of existing humanities and social science journals has problems such as ideological attribute evaluation indicators are not prominent, the openness and transparency of evaluation data need to be strengthened, the qualitative evaluation methods need to be improved, and the evaluation theoretical basis needs to be improved, and then suggestions for improving these problems are put forward. Part II: Comprehensive Evaluation Index System of Chinese Literature and Social Science Journals. In response to the questions raised in the first part, the Chinese Social Sciences Evaluation Center proposed the "Comprehensive Evaluation Index System of Chinese Social Science Journals". This index system is in line with the journal editing and publishing process, emphasizing academic evaluation, adding ideological attribute indicators, and introducing a deduction mechanism for evaluation and scoring, which not only attaches importance to the evaluation of journals, but also pays more attention to the guidance of journals. Part III: Development of the 2014 Evaluation Report of Chinese Literature and Social Science Journals. This part not only introduces the subject classification method, source and collection time of journals in this evaluation activity, but also puts forward the classification methods of journals in this evaluation activity: top, authoritative, core and extended, and explains the classification method of each level. Part IV: Evaluation results of Chinese and social science journals in 2014. This part adopts the comprehensive evaluation index system of Chinese and social science journals to evaluate 733 humanities and social science journals in China, and a total of 17 top journals, 40 authoritative journals, 430 core journals and 246 extended journals are evaluated.（AI翻译）