Sub-indicators for t...

章节信息目录

作者：

所属图书：《全球金融竞争力报告.2023》

出版日期：2024-05

字数： 22832

所属分类：

关键词：

换肤

字号

小中大

“后马克思主义”是马克思主义吗？

当前显示为试读部分，购买后可阅读全文×

v Sub-indicators for the competitiveness in international financial governance

Table 73，Table 76 and Table 79 show the ranking in terms of the three secondary indicators for the competitiveness in international financial governance.

Indicator 5.1: Competitiveness of global economic and Financial organizations

As can be seen from Table 73，among the secondary indicators for the competitiveness of global economic and financial organizations，those of developed countries are more prominent.Among them，the US ranked 1st with a full mark at 100.00，which shows the strong voice of the US in global economic and financial organizations.Chinese Inland and India，as representatives of developing countries，merely ranked 13th and 22nd in this regard.It is worth mentioning that Mexico ranked 10th with a score of 44.16，not only higher than Chinese Inland，but higher than the traditional developed country Australia.Mexico ranked higher than Chinese Inland because Chinese Inland only has three seats in the four largest global economic and financial organizations.Mexico stayed ahead of Australia in that Mexico is stronger concerning its foreign trade and international reserves than those of Australia，although the two countries remain a Roland for an Oliver when it comes to the scale of GDP，and these three perspectives are the main basis for the allocation of shares by global economic and financial organizations.Therefore，Mexico ranked slightly higher than Australia.

Table 73 Ranking of Secondary Indicator for the Competitiveness in International Financial Governance:Competitiveness of Global Economic and Financial Organizations

From the perspective of the competitiveness of global economic and financial organizations，international financial governance is yet to go from the hegemonic model to the real multilateral model，which is manifested in that global economic and financial organizations are still controlled by the developed countries，and there is still a large gap between the voice of emerging and developing countries in international financial affairs and their economic scale.This shows that significant progress has yet to be made in the series of reforms of the international financial governance system after the 2008 financial crisis and the emerging and developing countries saw the limited promotion of their voice in formal international economic and financial organizations.

其他推荐

感谢您的试读，阅读全文需要购买章节